Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Ir al contenido principal Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Anuario Asia Pacífico
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:India_China_locator.svg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:India_China_locator.svg
Artículos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/aap.2023.369
Enviado: 2023-01-19
Publicado: 2023-06-10

Las relaciones India-China a dos años de los incidentes de Galwan: territorialidad, rivalidad y competencia

Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Cuajimalpa/Departamento de Humanidades "
Bio
×

Mario González Castañeda

Mario González Castañeda es internacionalista de formación; maestro y doctor en Estudios de Asia y África, área: Sur de Asia, por el Centro de Estudios de Asia y África (CEAA), El Colegio de México. Actualmente, es investigador independiente y ha sido profesor-investigador de tiempo completo e invitado en universidades públicas y privadas. Cuenta con varias estancias de investigación: en la Jawaharlal Nehru University, India (2006-2007); en el Graduate Institute of International Studies, Suiza (2007); en la UAM-Cuajimalpa (2016, 2017). Su más reciente libro se titula: “Las relaciones India-China: el (re)encuentro de dos sistemas en la Posguerra Fría”, editado por el CEAA-El Colegio de México.

India China disputa territorial Quad competencia

Resumen

En este texto se revisa el estado de las relaciones India-China después de los incidentes ocurridos en Galwan. El enfrentamiento ha evidenciado no sólo la complejidad de la relación, particularmente en los aspectos comercial y de defensa, sino también que la irresolución del diferendo fronterizo persiste en ser uno de los principales catalizadores de la dinámica bilateral. Se observa que India ha empleado su participación en la plataforma de Diálogo de Seguridad Cuadrilateral como un instrumento para incidir en la relación con China. Finalmente, se evidencia el inicio de un conflicto comercial por el déficit en la balanza comercial de India con China.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. Abraham, Itty. 2008. “From Bandung to NAM: Non-Alignment and India Foreign Policy, 1947-65”. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 46 (2): 195-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040801990280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040801990280
  2. Abraham, Itty. 2009. “Contra-Proliferation: Interpreting the Meanings of India’s Nuclear Tests in 1974 and 1998”. En Inside Nuclear South Asia, editado por Scott D. Sagan, 106-136. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  3. Anderson, Benedict. 1993. Comunidades imaginadas: reflexiones sobre el origen y la difusión del nacionalismo. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  4. Appadorai, Angadipuram. 1981. The Domestic Roots of India’s Foreign Policy, 1947-1972. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  5. BBC. 2020. “Galwan Valley: China and India Clash on Freezing and Inhospitable Battlefield”. 17 de junio de 2020. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-53076781
  6. Bloomfield, Alan. 2021. “The India-China Bilateral Relationship: A ‘Serious and Enduring Rivalry’”. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 17 (1): 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2021.1878580 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2021.1878580
  7. Buzan, Barry. 2010. “China in International Society: is ‘Peaceful Rise’ Possible?”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3 (1): 5-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop014
  8. Buzan, Barry y Michael Cox. 2013. “China and the US: Comparable Cases of ‘Peaceful Rise’?”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 6 (2): 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pot003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pot003
  9. Chatterjee Miller, Manjari. 2013. Wronged by Empire: Post-Imperial Ideology and Foreign Policy in India and China. Stanford: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804786522.001.0001
  10. Chatterjee Miller, Manjari. 2016. “The Role of Beliefs in Identifying Rising Powers”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9 (2): 211-238. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pow006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pow006
  11. Chatterjee Miller, Manjari y Kate Sullivan de Estrada. 2017. “Pragmatism in Indian Foreign Policy: How Ideas Constrain Modi”. International Affairs 93 (1): 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiw001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiw001
  12. Cherian, John. 2019. “India & China: Resetting Relations”. Frontline, 29 de octubre de 2019. https://frontline.thehindu.com/world-affairs/article29766997.ece
  13. China Daily. 2021. “India’s 5G Ban Beyond Rationality”. 26 de mayo de 2021. https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202105/06/WS6093de59a31024ad0babc4fe.html
  14. Cohen, Stephen. 2001. India: Emerging Power. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution.
  15. Collin, Koh Swee Lean. 2019. “China-India Rivalry at Sea: Capability, Trends and Challenges”. Asian Security 15 (1): 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2019.1539820 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2019.1539820
  16. Efird, Brian, Jacek Krugler y Gaspare Genna. 2003. “From War to Integration: Generalizing Power Transition Theory”. International Interactions 29 (4): 293-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/714950654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/714950654
  17. Fang, Tien-sze. 2014. Asymmetrical Threat Perceptions in India-China Relations. Nueva Delhi: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198095958.001.0001
  18. Ganguly, Sumit. 2018. “India and China: On A Collision Course?”. Pacific Affairs 91 (2): 231-244. https://doi.org/10.5509/2018912231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5509/2018912231
  19. Ganguly, Sumit y Andrew Scobell. 2018. “The Himalayan Impasse: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Wake of Doklam”. The Washington Quarterly 41 (3): 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2018.1519369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2018.1519369
  20. Garver, John W. 2001. Protracted Contest: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Twentieth Century. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  21. Giaccaglia, Clarisa. 2017. “Poderes tradicionales, emergentes y re-emergentes: relaciones ambiguas pero pragmáticas”. Foro Internacional 57 (2): 422-459. https://doi.org/10.24201/fi.v57i2.2364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/fi.v57i2.2364
  22. Glaser, Bonnie S. y Evan S. Medeiros. 2007. “The Changing Ecology of Foreign PolicyMaking in China: The Ascension and Demise of the Theory of ‘Peaceful Rise’”. The China Quarterly 190: 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741007001208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741007001208
  23. González Castañeda, Mario. 2017. “India en los márgenes de la gobernanza global: las ambigüedades en la práctica del multilateralismo”. Relaciones Internacionales 26 (53): 19-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24215/23142766e010
  24. González Castañeda, Mario. 2020. Las relaciones India-China: el (re)encuentro de dos sistemas en la Posguerra Fría. Ciudad de México: El Colegio de México. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2z9g0c7
  25. González Castañeda, Mario y Bárbara Bavoleo. 2010. “Atomizando a la nación: la energía nuclear en el discurso de la nación de India”. Memoria y Sociedad 14 (29): 125-142. https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/memoysociedad/article/view/8264
  26. Haidar, Suhasini, Ananth Krishnan y Dinakar Peri. 2020. “Indian Army Says 20 Soldiers Killed in Clash with Chinese Troops in the Galwan Area”. The Hindu, 16 julio de 2020. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/indian-army-says-20-soldierskilled-in-clash-with-chinese-troops-in-the-galwan-area/article61668218.ece
  27. Haidar, Suhasini y Mini Tejaswi. 2022. “Facing Government Action, Huawei to Dial Down R&D Operations”. The Hindu, 21 de agosto de 2022. https://www.thehindu.com/business/Industry/after-raids-and-government-action-huawei-may-downsize-rdoperations/article65794568.ece
  28. Hall, Ian. 2019. Modi and the Reinvention of Indian Foreign Policy. Bristol: Bristol University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529204605.001.0001
  29. Hansen, Thomas Blom. 1999. The Saffron Wave. Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823055
  30. Hart, Andrew F. y Bruce D. Jones. 2010. “How do Rising Powers Rise?”. Survival 52 (6): 63-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2010.540783 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2010.540783
  31. Ikenberry, John G. 2008. “The Rise of China and the Future of the West”. Foreign Affairs 87 (1): 268-280. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Rise-of-China-and-theFuture-of-the-West-Ikenberry/61297a415e0d6f9051e3333cd5c3b9b032cfd5d7
  32. Jaffrelot, Christophe. 1996. The Hindu Nationalist Movement in India. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
  33. Jiangnan, Xian y Liang Jun. 2021. “Details of Chinese Martyrs who Sacrificed their Lives in Galwan Valley Revealed for First Time”. People’s Daily, 20 de julio de 2021. http://en.people.cn/n3/2021/0720/c90000-9874553.html
  34. Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2003. “Is China a Status Quo Power?”. International Security 27 (4): 5-56. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803321951081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803321951081
  35. Jordaan, Eduard. 2003. “The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing Between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers”. Politikon 30 (1): 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0258934032000147282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0258934032000147282
  36. Kaura, Vinay. 2020. “Rising Powers or Bitter Frenemies? India-China Relations in the 21st Century”. Social Transformations in Chinese Societies 16 (2): 111-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/STICS-05-2020-0016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/STICS-05-2020-0016
  37. Kennedy, Paul. 1989. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. Nueva York: Vintage Books.
  38. Keohane, Robert. 1986. “Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond”. En Neorealism and its Critics, editado por Robert Keohane, 158-203. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
  39. Keohane, Robert. 1989. “La teoría de la estabilidad hegemónica y los cambios en los regímenes económicos internacionales: 1967-1977”. En Instituciones internacionales y poder estatal. Ensayos sobre teoría de las relaciones internacionales, editado por Robert Keohane, 39-54. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.
  40. Keohane, Robert y Joseph S. Nye. 2000. “Introduction”. En Governance in a Globalizing World, editado por Joseph S. Nye y John Donahue, 1-42. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.
  41. Khilnani, Sunil. 1999. The Idea of India. Nueva Delhi: Penguin Books.
  42. Khilnani, Sunil et al. 2012. Nonalignment 2.0: A Foreign and Strategic Policy for India in the Twenty First Century. Nueva Delhi: Centre for Policy Research.
  43. Kliem, Frederick. 2020. “Why Quasi-Alliances Will Persist in The Indo-Pacific? The Fall and Rise of the Quad”. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs 7 (3): 271-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347797020962620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2347797020962620
  44. Krasner, Stephen, 1983. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables”. International Organization 36 (2): 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018920
  45. Kugler, Jacek y A. F. K. Organski. 1980. The War Ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  46. Kumar, K. Bharat. 2020. “What Will Be the Impact of Chinese Apps Ban?”. The Hindu, 5 de julio de 2020. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/the-hindu-explains-whatwill-be-the-impact-of-chinese-apps-ban/article61687681.ece
  47. Kundra, Jagdish Chandra. 1956. Indian Foreign Policy: 1947-1954. A Study of Relations with the Western Bloc. Groninga: J. B. Wolters.
  48. Maxwell, Neville. 1970. India’s China War. Bombay: Jaico Publishing House.
  49. McCartney, Patrick. 2017. “Politics Beyond the Yoga Mat: Yoga Fundamentalism and the ‘Vedic Way of Life’”. Global Ethnographic 4: 1-18.
  50. Mehta, Pratap Bhanu. 2009. “Still Under Nehru’s Shadow? The Absence of Foreign Policy Frameworks in India”. India Review 8 (3): 209-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14736480903116750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14736480903116750
  51. Modi, Narendra. 2018. “Prime Minister’s Keynote Address at Shangri La Dialogue”. Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. 1 de junio de 2018. https://mea.gov.in/Speeches-Statements.htm?dtl/29943/Prime_Ministers_Keynote_Address
  52. Modi, Narendra. 2020. “Top 10 Quotes from PM Modi’s Address to Soldiers of Indian Army in Ladakh”. The Hindustan Times, 3 de julio de 2020. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/top-10-quotes-from-pm-modi-s-address-to-soldiers-of-indian-armyin-ladakh/story-rxh3RmtJAG7jpDD2CSnaKO.html
  53. Narlikar, Amrita. 2013a. “Negotiating the Rise of New Powers”. International Affairs 89 (3): 561-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12033
  54. Narlikar, Amrita. 2013b. “India Rising: Responsible to Whom?”. International Affairs 89 (3): 595-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12035
  55. Nayar, Baldev Raj y T. V. Paul. 2003. India in the World Order: Searching for Major Power Status. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808593
  56. Nehru, Jawaharlal. 1987. Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru. Vols. 1, 4, 5. Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund.
  57. Nolte, Detlef. 2006. Potencias regionales en la política internacional: conceptos y enfoques de análisis. Hamburgo: German Institute of Global and Areas Studies.
  58. O’Donnell, Frank y Harsh V. Pant. 2015. “Managing Indian Defense Policy: The Missing Grand Strategy Connection”. Orbis, 59 (2): 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2015.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2015.02.003
  59. Organski, A. F. K. 1958. World Politics. Nueva York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  60. Palou, Jordi. 1993. “El concepto de potencia media. Los casos de España y México”. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals 26: 7-35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40585538
  61. Panagariya, Arvind. 2020. “On China Trade Sanctions: India Can Serve its National Security Much Better by Rapidly Expanding its Economy”. The Times of India, 25 de junio de 2020. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/toi-edit-page/on-china-tradesanctions-india-can-serve-its-national-security-much-better-by-rapidly-expandingits-economy/
  62. Pant, Hars V. 2013. “China on the Horizon: India’s ‘Look East’ Policy Gathers Momentum”. Orbis 57 (3): 453-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2013.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2013.05.007
  63. Pardesi, Manjeet S. 2019. “The Initiation of the Sino-Indian Rivalry”. Asian Security 15 (3): 253-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2018.1471060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2018.1471060
  64. Paul, T. V., ed. 2018. The China-India Rivalry in the Globalization Era. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv75db2z
  65. Pouliot, Vincent. 2011. “Multilateralism as an End in Itself”. International Studies Perspectives 12 (1): 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2010.00416.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2010.00416.x
  66. PTI. 2017. “Doklam Standoff: India Should Draw Lessons Says China”. The Indian Express, 30 de agosto de 2017. https://indianexpress.com/article/world/doklam-standoffindia-should-draw-lessons-says-china/
  67. PTI. 2019. “Modi-Xi Meet Reflects Positive Atmospherics; Signals Recalibration of Ties”. The Asian Age, 12 de octubre de 2019. https://www.asianage.com/india/allindia/121019/modi-xi-meet-in-tamil-nadu-reflects-positive-atmospherics-signalsrecalibration-of-ties.html
  68. PTI. 2020. “3 Soldiers Killed in India-China Clash at Galwan”. The Asian Age, 16 de junio 2020. https://www.asianage.com/india/all-india/160620/clash-at-galwan-valley-during-de-escalation-process.html
  69. Rajya Sabha. 2018. “One Hundred and Forty-Fifth Report on ‘Impact of Chinese Goods on Indian Industry’”. Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Commerce. https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/Committee_site/Committee_File/Press_ReleaseFile/13/97/193P_2018_8_12.pdf
  70. Scroll Staff. 2019. “India-China Informal Summit: Xi Jinping and PM Modi Discuss Terror, Radicalisation in Mamallapuram”. Scroll.in, 12 de octubre de 2019. https://scroll.in/latest/940243/india-china-informal-summit-xi-jinping-pm-modi-discuss-tradedeficit-terrorism-in-mamallapuram
  71. Shirk, Susan. 2004. “One-Sided Rivalry: China’s Perceptions and Policies Towards India”. En The India-China Relationship: What the US Needs to Know, editado por Francine Frankel y Harri Harding, 71-89. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
  72. Sury, M. M. 2021. “How Economic Distancing from China Has Benefited India”. Times Now News, 26 de marzo de 2021. https://www.timesnownews.com/business-economy/economy/article/how-economic-distancing-from-china-has-benefited-india/737389
  73. The Times of India. 2020. “Indian Army Officer, 2 Jawans Killed in ‘Violent Face-Off’ with Chinese Troops in Galwan Valley”. 16 de junio de 2020. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/army-officer-2-jawans-killed-in-violent-face-off-with-chinatroops/articleshow/76401229.cms
  74. Vajpayee, Atal Bihari. 1998. “Nuclear Anxiety; India’s Letter to Clinton on the Nuclear Testing”. The New York Times, 13 de mayo de 1998. https://www.nytimes.com/1998/05/13/world/nuclear-anxiety-indian-s-letter-to-clinton-on-the-nuclear-testing.html
  75. Waltz, Kenneth. 1988. Teoría de la política internacional. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.
  76. Wang, Shida. 2020. “Banning Chinese Apps Bad for India’s Trade”. China Daily, 28 de julio de 2020. https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202007/28/WS5f1f6473a31083481725c5c1.html
  77. Yang, Xiaoping. 2022. “Sino-Indian Ties Face a Window of Opportunities”. China Daily, 26 de marzo de 2022. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202203/26/WS623dd0cba310fd2b29e53696.html
  78. Zhang, Jie. 2019. “The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue and Reconstruction of Asia-Pacific Order”. China International Studies, 1: 55-73.
  79. Zhao, Lei. 2020. “India Solely Responsible for Border Clash in Galwan Valley: Spokesman”. China Daily, 24 de junio de 2020. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202006/24/WS5ef33db5a3108348172553ab.html
  80. Zheng, Bijian. 2005. “China’s ‘Peaceful Rise’ to Great Power Status”. Foreign Affairs 84 (5): 18-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/20031702 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20031702
  81. Zhou, Jin. 2020. “India Urged to Halt Border Violation”. China Daily, 17 de junio de 2020. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202006/17/WS5ee9503ca3108348172537c3.html

Cómo citar

González Castañeda, Mario. 2023. «Las Relaciones India-China a Dos años De Los Incidentes De Galwan: Territorialidad, Rivalidad Y Competencia». Anuario Asia Pacífico El Colegio de México, junio. México, MX, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.24201/aap.2023.369.

Metricas Vistas/Descargas

  • Resumen visto - 398 veces
  • PDF descargado: 139 veces
  • XML descargado: 13 veces
  • EPUB descargado: 8 veces
  • Kindle descargado: 9 veces
  • MP3 descargado: 3 veces