Ir al contenido principal Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Anuario Asia Pacífico
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:New_Silk_Road_-es.svg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:New_Silk_Road_-es.svg
Artículos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/aap.2024.390
Enviado: 2023-10-05
Publicado: 2024-11-07

La Iniciativa de la Franja y la Ruta como modelo complementario al desarrollo: reflexiones en torno a una década de existencia

Escuela de Ciencias Sociales y Gobierno, Tecnológico de Monterrey
##plugins.generic.jatsParser.article.authorBio##
×

Daniel Ricardo Lemus Delgado

Es profesor investigador de la Escuela de Ciencia Sociales y Gobierno del Tecnológico de Monterrey. Es licenciado en Historia por la Universidad de Guadalajara, Maestro en Estudios Humanísticos por el Tecnológico de Monterrey y Doctor en Relaciones Internacionales Transpacíficas, por la Universidad de Colima. Es profesor titular de las materias Teorías de Relaciones Internacionales y Escenario de Asia Pacífico, en la Licenciatura en Relaciones Internacionales en el Tecnológico de Monterrey. Ha sido Visiting Scholar en la Universidad de Fudan, Shanghai, en China. Es miembro del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores, nivel II y Miembro Regular de la Academia Mexicana de la Ciencias.

China Geopolítica Constructivismo La Franja y la Ruta Financiamiento para el desarrollo

Resumen

Con base en un enfoque teórico constructivista, se sugiere que nuestros modelos
mentales moldeados por las aproximaciones clásicas de la geopolítica son limitados para
entender el creciente papel de China en el mundo porque no consideran que los intereses de
los países en el escenario internacional son una construcción social. Con la intención de
evidenciar cómo se conforman estos intereses, se analiza la iniciativa de la Franja y la Ruta
y se sugiere que representa un modelo de financiamiento y ayuda al desarrollo, complementario
a los enfoques tradicionales. Como sugiere el constructivismo, este hecho es el resultado de
la interacción entre las identidades, las normas y los intereses presentes en los actores del
escenario internacional.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. Addler, E. 2002. “Constructivism and International Relations”. En Handbook of International Relations, editado por Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse y Beth A. Simmons, 95-118. Londres: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608290.n5
  2. Agnew, John. 2003. Geopolitics: Re-visioning World Politics. Londres: Routledge.
  3. Aibai, Abuduwali, Xianjing Huang, Yu Luo y Yuchao Peng. 2019. “Foreign Direct Investment, Institutional Quality, and Financial Development along the Belt and Road: An Empirical Investigation”. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 55 (14): 3275-3294. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1559139
  4. Allison, Graham T. 2017. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  5. Anderson, Ewan W. 1999. “Geopolitics: International Boundaries as Fighting Places”. Journal of Strategic Studies 22 (2-3): 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402399908437757
  6. Bell, Morag, Robin A. Butlin y Michel Heffernan. 1995. “Introduction: Geography and Imperialism, 1820-1940”. En Geography and Imperialism, 1820-1940, editado por Morag Bell, Robin A. Butlin y Michel Heffernan, 1-12. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  7. Blanchard, Jean-Marc F. y Colin Flint. 2017. “The Geopolitics of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative”. Geopolitics 22 (2): 223-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1291503
  8. Central Committee of the CCP. 2024. “Secure a Decisive Victory in Building a Moderately Prosperous Society in all Respects and Strive for the Great Success of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, Delivered at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China”. Interpret: China. Original publicado en Xinhua News Agency el 18 de octubre de 2017. https://interpret.csis.org/translations/secure-adecisive-victory-in-building-a-moderately-prosperous-society-in-all-respects-and-strive-for-the-great-success-of-socialism-with-chinese-characteristics-for-a-newera-delivered-at-the/
  9. Chen, Xiangming y Fakhmiddin Fazilov. 2018. “Re-centering Central Asia: China’s ‘New Great Game’ in the Old Eurasian Heartland”. Palgrave Communications 4 (1): 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0125-5
  10. Chen, Yaowen, Zuojun Fan, Jie Zhang y Min Mo. 2019. “Does the Connectivity of the Belt and Road Initiative Contribute to the Economic Growth of the Belt and Road Countries?”. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 55 (14): 3227-3240. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1643315
  11. Chen, Zhihua. 2023. “The Impact of the Belt and Road Infrastructure Development on the Economic Growth of the Partner Countries”. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies 15 (2), 254-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749101231167454
  12. Clarke, Michael. 2017. “The Belt and Road Initiative: China’s New Grand Strategy?”. Asia Policy, núm. 24, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2017.0023
  13. Dadabaev, Timur. 2018. “‘Silk Road’ as Foreign Policy Discourse: The Construction of Chinese, Japanese and Korean Engagement Strategies in Central Asia”. Journal of Eurasian Studies 9 (1): 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2017.12.003
  14. Della Posta, Pompeo. 2023. “The Belt and Road Initiative: Inclusive Globalization and Poverty Reduction”. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies 15 (2): 273-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749101231167448
  15. Demiryol, Tolga. 2022. “Between Geopolitics and Development: The Belt and Road Initiative and the Limits of Capital Accumulation in China”. China Report 58 (4): 410-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455221080313
  16. Fallon, Theresa. 2015. “The New Silk Road: Xi Jinping’s Grand Strategy for Eurasia”. American Foreign Policy Interests 37 (3): 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803920.2015.1056682
  17. Geng, Qingge y Kevin Lo. 2022. “China’s Green Belt and Road Initiative: Transnational Environmental Governance and Causal Pathways of Orchestration”. Environmental Politics 32 (7): 1163-1185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2156176
  18. Griffiths, Martin, Terry O’Callaghan y Steven C. Roach. 2014. International Relations: The Key Concepts. Londres: Routledge.
  19. Hanania, Richard. 2021. “Graham Allison and the Thucydides Trap Myth”. Strategic Studies Quarterly 15 (4): 13-24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48638049
  20. Hansen, Valerie. 2012. The Silk Road: A New History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  21. Hobson, John M. 2000. The State and the International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Hopf, Ted. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory”. International Security 23 (1): 171-200. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.1.171
  23. Iqbal, Badar Alam, Mohd Nayyer Rahman y Shaista Sami. 2019. “Impact of Belt and Road Initiative on Asian Economies”. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies 11 (3): 260-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974910119887059
  24. Jackson, Robert H. y Georg Sørensen. 2003. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. Jiang, Yuan. 2021. “Demystifying the Belt and Road Initiative: China’s Domestic and Non-Strategic Policy?”. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 6 (4): 468-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911211038876
  26. Kaplan, Robert D. 2009. “The Revenge of Geography”. Foreign Policy, núm. 172, 96-105. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20684874
  27. Kearns, Gerry. 2009. Geopolitics and Empire: The Legacy of Halford Mackinder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  28. Lai, Hongyi. 2021. “The Rationale and Effects of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Reducing Vulnerabilities in Domestic Political Economy”. Journal of Contemporary China 30 (128): 330-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2020.1790896
  29. Lemus-Delgado, Daniel y Francisco Valderrey Villar. 2017. “La Nueva Ruta de la Seda y la diplomacia internacional de negocios”. Comillas Journal of International Relations, núm. 10, 47-64. https://doi.org/10.14422/cir.i10.y2017.004
  30. Lemus-Delgado, Daniel. 2023. “Laslimitaciones paradigmáticas del concepto de hegemonía: China y el Sur Global”. Colombia Internacional, núm. 113, 85-111. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint113.2023.04
  31. Lin, Justin Yifu. 2019. “China’s Rejuvenation and the Belt and Road Initiative”. En How China’s Silk Road Initiative is Changing the Global Economic Landscape, editado por Yuan Li y Markus Taube, 21-36. Nueva York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429455193-2
  32. Luft, Gal. 2016. “China’s Infrastructure Play: Why Washington Should Accept the New Silk Road”. Foreign Affairs 95 (5): 68-75. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/chinas-infrastructure-play
  33. Maliszewska, Maryla y Dominique van der Mensbrugghe. 2019. The Belt and Road Initiative Economic, Poverty and Environmental Impacts. Policy Research Working Paper 8814. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31543
  34. Marcoux, Jean-Michel y Julien Sylvestre-Fleury. 2022. “China’s Contestation of International Norms on State-Owned Enterprises and Government Procurement through the Belt and Road Initiative”. Asia Pacific Law Review 30 (2): 325-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2085413
  35. Men, Honghau y Steve Tsang. 2016. “Genesis of a Pivotal Decade”. En China in the Xi Jinping Era, editado por Steve Tsang y Honghua Men, 1-16. Londres: Palgrave McMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29549-7_1
  36. Menegazzi, Silvia. 2017. “China’s Foreign Policy and Ideational Narratives: Key Trends and Major Challenges”. En Understanding China Today. An Exploration of Politics, Economics, Society, and International Relations, editado por Silvio Beretta, Axel Berkofsky y Lihong Zhang, 175-185. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
  37. 3-319-29625-8_10
  38. Millward, James A. 2013. The Silk Road: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199782864.001.0001
  39. Mori, Sebastiano. 2016. The New Great Game: An Opportunity for European Union’s Common and Foreign and Security Policy. EIAS Briefing Paper. Bruselas: European Institute for Asian Studies.
  40. Moses, Oyintarelado, Cecilia Springer y Kevin P. Gallagher. 2023. Demystifying Chinese Overseas Lending and Development Finance: Why China Became the World’s Largest Official Bilateral Lender. GCI Policy Brief 018. Boston: Boston University.
  41. Nam, Park Sam. 2010. “China’s Emergence as a Key Player in the Global Order and Its Impacts on Geopolitics in Central Asia”. International Area Studies Review 13 (1): 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/223386591001300108
  42. NDRC (National Development and Reform Commission). 2015. “Action Plan on the Belt and Road Initiative”. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 30 de marzo de 2015. http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/publications/2015/03/30/content_281475080249035.htm
  43. Nedopil, Christoph. 2023. Countries of the Belt and Road Initiative. Shanghái: Green Finance & Development Center. https://greenfdc.org/countries-of-the-belt-and-roadinitiative-bri/
  44. Nedopil, Christoph. 2024. China Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Investment Report 2023. Griffith Asia Institute, Griffith University (Brisbane) y Green Finance & Development Center, FISF Fudan University (Shanghái). https://greenfdc.org/chinabelt-and-road-initiative-bri-investment-report-2023/
  45. OECD. 2018. “China’s Belt and Road Initiative in the Global Trade, Investment and Finance Landscape”. En OECD Business and Finance Outlook 2018. París: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bus_fin_out-2018-6-en
  46. Onuf, Nicholas. 2012. World of Our Making. Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203722428
  47. Reus-Smith, Christian. 2005. “Constructivism”. En Theories of International Relations, editado por Scott Burchill, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donnelly, Mathew Paterson, Christian Reus-Smit y Jacqui True, 188-210. Nueva York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  48. Sabet, Amr G. E. 2015. “Geopolitics of a Changing World Order: US Strategy and the Scramble for the Eurasian Heartland”. Contemporary Arab Affairs 8 (2): 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550912.2015.1018717
  49. Secretariat (Secretariat of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Sub-Fund of the United Nations Peace and Development Trust Fund). 2022. Partnering for a Brighter Shared Future. Progress Report on the Belt and Road Initiative in Support of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Nueva York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/wcm.files/upload/CMSydylyw/202209/202209190500015.pdf
  50. Sakouba, Ibrahim y Chen, Zhang. 2023. “Infrastructure Spending and the Regional Financial Development: Evidence from the Eastern African Belt and Road Initiative Countries”. Journal of Asian and African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096231188944
  51. Singh, Arvinder. 2002. “Understanding China’s‘Go-West’ Campaign”. China Report 38 (1): 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/000944550203800117
  52. Summers, Tim. 2020. “Structural Power and the Financing of the Belt and Road Initiative”. Eurasian Geography and Economics 61 (2): 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2020.1715234
  53. SCIO (The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China). 2023. The Belt and Road Initiative: A Key Pillar of the Global Community of Shared Future. https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/whitepaper/202310/10/content_WS6524b55fc6d0868f4e8e014c.html
  54. Tzili-Apango, Eduardo. 2022. “La geopolítica formal de la Iniciativa de la Franja y la Ruta como bien público global”. Anuario Asia Pacífico El Colegio de México 2022, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.24201/aap.2022.343
  55. Walberg, Eric. 2011. Postmodern Imperialism: Geopolitics and the Great Games. Atlanta: Clarity Press.
  56. Wendt, Alexander. 1994. “Collective Identity Formation and the International State”. The American Political Science Review 88 (2): 384-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944711
  57. Williams, Micheal C. 2005. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491771
  58. Winter, Tim. 2021. “Geocultural Power: China’s Belt and Road Initiative”. Geopolitics 26 (5): 1376-1399. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1718656
  59. World Bank. 2019. Belt and Road Economics: Opportunities and Risks of Transport Corridors. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/publication/belt-and-road-economics-opportunities-and-risksof-transport-corridors
  60. Wu, Zhengyu. 2018. “Classical Geopolitics, Realism and the Balance of Power Theory”. Journal of Strategic Studies 41 (6): 786-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2017.1379398
  61. Yang, Jiemian. 2015. “China’s ‘New Diplomacy’ under the Xi Jinping Administration”. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 1 (1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740015500013
  62. Yu, Hong. 2019. “Reflections on the Belt and Road Initiative”. China: An International
  63. Journal 17 (4): 8-23. https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2019.0038
  64. Yu, Shirley. 2019. “The Belt and Road Initiative: Modernity, Geopolitics and The Developing Global Order”. Asian Affairs 50 (2): 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2019.1602389
  65. Zhang, Kunling. 2023. “Can the Belt and Road Initiative Promote the Industrialization of Developing Countries?”. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies 15 (2): 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749101231167447
  66. Zhao, Hong. 2019. “China’s Belt and Road Initiative and ASEAN”. China: An International Journal 17 (2): 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2019.0019

Cómo citar

Lemus Delgado, Daniel Ricardo. 2024. «La Iniciativa De La Franja Y La Ruta Como Modelo Complementario Al Desarrollo: Reflexiones En Torno a Una década De Existencia». Anuario Asia Pacífico El Colegio De México, noviembre. México, MX. https://doi.org/10.24201/aap.2024.390.

Metricas Vistas/Descargas

  • Resumen visto - 30 veces
  • PDF descargado: 18 veces